Coexistence & CEAS

Two tools for understanding before acting.

Questions involving cats, communities, wildlife, and conservation can become complicated very quickly.

Different animals live in different places. Risks are not the same everywhere. Communities have different needs. Wildlife concerns vary by species and location. And an action that sounds reasonable does not necessarily address the factor actually causing a problem.

Kahu Pōpoki uses two connected tools to help make better decisions:

  • the Coexistence Framework and
  • the Conservation Evidence & Accountability Standard (CEAS).

Together they encourage us to understand the animal, the place, the evidence, and the intended outcome before deciding what should happen.

 

The Coexistence Framework

What kind of management fits this place?

The Coexistence Framework begins with a simple idea:

Place matters.

A cat living as a household pet presents a very different management situation from a community cat in a residential neighborhood or a cat near sensitive wildlife habitat.

The framework recognizes three primary zones:  PET & COMMUNITY & WILDLIFE.

PET CAT Zone

Cats living in homes or under direct human care.  The focus is responsible care, identification, sterilization, recovery when lost, pet retention, and preventing abandonment.

COMMUNITY CAT Zone

Cats living outdoors in neighborhoods, commercial areas, farms, and other community settings.  Management may include sterilization, feeding, monitoring, veterinary care, recovery of lost pets, adoption where appropriate, and long-term population management.

WILDLIFE Zone

Places where wildlife protection becomes an important management consideration.  The approach should reflect the particular species, habitat, level of risk, and available evidence.

The central question remains:  What approach makes sense for these animals, in this place, based on the actual risks and needs?

That brings us to CEAS.

 

CEAS - Conservation Evidence & Accountability Standard

What does the evidence actually support?

CEAS was developed to help examine conservation claims and proposed interventions more carefully.  It asks us to identify the species or population actually at issue, understand its condition and limiting factors, determine whether a claimed threat materially contributes to the problem, and evaluate whether the proposed intervention is likely to produce a measurable biological result.

At the center of CEAS are The 8 Conservation Questions.

The 8 Conservation Questions

  1. What species or population is actually at issue?
  2. What is its current status and trend?
  3. What are the documented limiting factors?
  4. What evidence demonstrates that the proposed threat materially contributes?
  5. How important is that factor relative to the other limiting factors?
  6. What intervention directly addresses the demonstrated problem?
  7. What measurable biological outcome is expected?
  8. How will success be measured and management adapted?

The questions do not determine the answer in advance.  The evidence does.

CEAS also distinguishes between two different kinds of claims:

Past Evidence -  What has actually been demonstrated.

Future Claim - What must be shown before an intervention can reasonably be expected to produce the intended result.

That distinction helps separate what we know from what we hope or predict will happen.

 

Using Them Together

Place tells us where to look. Evidence helps tell us what to do.


The Coexistence Framework and CEAS answer different parts of the same problem.

The Coexistence Framework helps us understand the setting:

  • What kind of place is this?
  • What animals and people are involved?
  • What risks and needs are present?

CEAS then helps us examine the conservation claim and proposed response:

  • What does the evidence demonstrate?
  • What factor actually matters?
  • Will the proposed action address it?
  • How will we know whether it worked?

Together, they create a practical path:

Understand the place → Examine the evidence → Choose the intervention → Measure the result

This is part of the kuleana that comes with making decisions affecting animals, wildlife, communities, and place.

Good intentions matter.  So does knowing whether our actions actually helped.

 

Continue Learning

[Explore Cats, Communities & Wildlife]

[Browse Research & Resources]

[Explore What Works]